<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DodgeRTclub.com &#187; DodgeRTclub.com- Dodge R/T history, Modern Mopars, LX cars and more @</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dodgertclub.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dodgertclub.com</link>
	<description>History of Dodge R/T cars, trucks,SUVs, Chrysler performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daniel Brandt&#8217;s &#8217;10 1500 R/T by admin</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/readers-mopars/daniel-brandts-10-r1500-rt/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?page_id=577#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Not my truck but ill chime in regarding your point about a family truck... They made 4-door Ram SRT10s so why not a 4-door R/T. Maybe they are available by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not my truck but ill chime in regarding your point about a family truck&#8230; They made 4-door Ram SRT10s so why not a 4-door R/T. Maybe they are available by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daniel Brandt&#8217;s &#8217;10 1500 R/T by Gen IV RT</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/readers-mopars/daniel-brandts-10-r1500-rt/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen IV RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?page_id=577#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Love your truck......  The SRT10 wheels were added, right?  I&#039;d like to have a Ram R/T, but I need room for the family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your truck&#8230;&#8230;  The SRT10 wheels were added, right?  I&#8217;d like to have a Ram R/T, but I need room for the family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dakota R/T by Gen IV RT</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/dodge-dakota-rt-history-specs/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen IV RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?page_id=16#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The rewrite sounds much better.  Thanks..........  Didn&#039;t mean to sound so critical of the description, but it&#039;s really hard having something different that people think of as being underdone or out of place.  I added a free flowing cat-back system and a better air system to mine, and I have to think it&#039;s got a little more horsepower now than it did have. The truck is really fun to drive, and handles well, too. Under your reader&#039;s rides heading you will find a picture of my R/T.  Feel free to use it if you wish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rewrite sounds much better.  Thanks&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  Didn&#8217;t mean to sound so critical of the description, but it&#8217;s really hard having something different that people think of as being underdone or out of place.  I added a free flowing cat-back system and a better air system to mine, and I have to think it&#8217;s got a little more horsepower now than it did have. The truck is really fun to drive, and handles well, too. Under your reader&#8217;s rides heading you will find a picture of my R/T.  Feel free to use it if you wish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dakota R/T by admin</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/dodge-dakota-rt-history-specs/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?page_id=16#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Slow down there. First off there&#039;s no &quot;you folks&quot; here, just one guy, me. I don&#039;t claim to be an expert in all areas of Mopar. You&#039;re coming off a bit critical yourself.

I&#039;ve adjusted some wording in this section, as there was no ridicule of the 4g Dak R/T intended. 

However, the 4g is heavier than the previous version and that is a detriment, to a point. The 4.7 is capable and better overall than the old 5.9 but the horsepower in 2006 and 2007 was what 10 more than the 5.9? The earlier R/Ts had the same 3.92 axle available. The &#039;06 and &#039;07 were hardly game changing, performance wise.  
 
Power to weight ratio isn&#039;t everything. Either way, the late Dak R/Ts are a better overall vehicle. They&#039;re better looking in my opinion also.

Since you could probably make a more detailed write up on the &#039;06, &#039;07 Dak R/Ts than I, feel free to send me one to replace what is here. Seriously, No jab intended. I never owned a 4g Dak R/T, so you&#039;d know better than I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slow down there. First off there&#8217;s no &#8220;you folks&#8221; here, just one guy, me. I don&#8217;t claim to be an expert in all areas of Mopar. You&#8217;re coming off a bit critical yourself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve adjusted some wording in this section, as there was no ridicule of the 4g Dak R/T intended. </p>
<p>However, the 4g is heavier than the previous version and that is a detriment, to a point. The 4.7 is capable and better overall than the old 5.9 but the horsepower in 2006 and 2007 was what 10 more than the 5.9? The earlier R/Ts had the same 3.92 axle available. The &#8217;06 and &#8217;07 were hardly game changing, performance wise.  </p>
<p>Power to weight ratio isn&#8217;t everything. Either way, the late Dak R/Ts are a better overall vehicle. They&#8217;re better looking in my opinion also.</p>
<p>Since you could probably make a more detailed write up on the &#8217;06, &#8217;07 Dak R/Ts than I, feel free to send me one to replace what is here. Seriously, No jab intended. I never owned a 4g Dak R/T, so you&#8217;d know better than I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dakota R/T by Gen IV RT</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/dodge-dakota-rt-history-specs/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen IV RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?page_id=16#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Just a comment/question...........  Do you folks actually read what you write?  How can the Gen IV Dakota R/T be considered just an appearance package when in your own description it boasts more horsepower than the so-called performance truck?  As a very proud and happy Gen IV owner, it gets old having my truck criticized for being an appearance package, when in fact, it has many of the original truck&#039;s options, like special wheels, gauges, ENGINE(17 major differences between the standard 4.7 and the H.O.), interior, exhaust, 3.92 limited slip, etc..........  I like my truck, and so do most of the people that have been around it.  Thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a comment/question&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..  Do you folks actually read what you write?  How can the Gen IV Dakota R/T be considered just an appearance package when in your own description it boasts more horsepower than the so-called performance truck?  As a very proud and happy Gen IV owner, it gets old having my truck criticized for being an appearance package, when in fact, it has many of the original truck&#8217;s options, like special wheels, gauges, ENGINE(17 major differences between the standard 4.7 and the H.O.), interior, exhaust, 3.92 limited slip, etc&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  I like my truck, and so do most of the people that have been around it.  Thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spirit R/T owner by admin</title>
		<link>http://dodgertclub.com/2011/11/09/spirit-rt-owner/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dodgertclub.com/?p=337#comment-3</guid>
		<description>hey, welcome to the mix!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, welcome to the mix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

